Rebekka Naatus: Laestadian Women Resist Big Family Pressure and Criticize the Ban on Contraception

The women rights have got a important step forward, when the  Finland’s First Conservative Laestadian Female Priest, Mrs. Mari Leppänen, was  secretly ordained as priest in 2012, in order to start her work in Lieto parish, near to Turku. Listen here the detalis of the issues in English (information on womens’ rights and bans in the Conservative Laestadian movement in general, too).

Also Mrs. Rebekka Naatus, a journalist, divorced Laestadian woman is making waves by speaking out against the treatment of women with the movement to which she belongs.

Rebekka Naatus, the PR and information officer of Evangelical Lutheran parishes in Oulu, has published an article about these questions in an  anthology Iloisen talon kellareissa (”In the Cellars of a Merry House”, not translated in English).  She has been interviewed in media on the womens’ situation in the biggest revival movement in the country, Conservative Laestadianism. Are their bodies really their own, or has the religious community colonised them to reproduction where no anyone is allowed to refuse?

The focus is in the problems following from the very tight and strict community of the religious or rather ”ethnic” group. The community has a strong power in the individual’s everyday life and in the choice of personal lifestyle. 
The Laestadianism is a strongly conservative religious movement within the Lutheran church in Finland, where the group is particularly influential in and around Oulu. Conservative Laestadians is the biggest branch of the Laestadian revival movement. The movement has split into 19 separated branches, of which about 15 are active today.

While being most prominent in Finland, the movement has members in the Scandinavian and Baltic countries as well as in Russia and North America and smaller congregations in Ecuador, and Togo. There are estimated 200 000 Laestadians worldwide. Laestadians are generally known for their conservative values and exclusive social identity.

Mostly members have not joined the movement as adult on their own initiative but they are raised into beliefs of Laestadianism at home and in the congregation in the childhood. A human being becomes what he or she repeats, and laeestadian children admit sermons weekly, they have to go to the Sunday school, Bible classes etc.

In Finland, the leading board of the movement, the Central Committee of Conservative Laestadian Congregations (SRK), is located in Oulu. However, there are nowadays some of the biggest local  Associations of Peace working in southern Finland, due to the big migration and urbanization and due to the Conservative Laestadians’ doctrine that any kind of birth control is a sin.

Members have large families, an average of ten children, and look and behave subtly differently from non-members. Women tend to reject make-up, ear-rings and hair dying but otherwise embrace the latest fashions, members are more inclined to smoke and television is supposedly not allowed – but tv programmes are allowed to watch in the Internet.

Importantly, contraception is said to be  a sin, by the decision that was documented in the meeting of lay preachers and priests in the year 1967.

Male-dominated group, dependent on  women’s subordination and loyalty

The Laestadian priest Seppo Lohi has argumented, that without women’s commitment to frequent pregnancies and to producing big families the number of members in the Laestadian movement would decrease very quickly. His prediction is that Laestadian movement would even absolutely die end in 50 years, if Laestadians would abandon their commitment for not using contraception.

Thus, there is a great pressing to become pregnant as often as it just will happen and have a big family.The spiritual argument said by preachers is that a child is a God’s gift, and a woman has to receive totally all the gifts of the God. This is a distinctive mark of a real christian and an affirmation for salvation and heaven. Girls are taught to become adapted to their spiritual tasks as expected large family’s mothers  in the congregation in their early childhood.

Our bodies are our own

But one woman, herself a Laestadian, has been making waves in the Finnish media by speaking about against the treatment of women by the movement.

According to Rebekka Naatus, changes are afoot within the group. Female Laestadians are increasingly coming to believe that their bodies are their own and they do not wish to spend the best part of their lives simply producing and caring for children.

For three years ago there was a great debate on the ban on the contraception. The The Finnish League for Human Rights arranged a investigation on the issue and published a statement written by the eperts and lawyers,  specialiced in law of human rights. According of the statement (5.3.2009) the Laestadians’ ban on contraception brakes an international and Finnish constitutional law of human rights.

Nevertheless, the Lutheran church of Finland has forgotten this decision later,  without giving any official statement on it. However, the debate has not fallen silent, but it has moved from the societal  and women’s rights’ point of view to the individual level. It seems that this is not only a fruithless view as expected.

There are online discussion forums in which young Laestadian women discuss their misgivings about their treatment by the movement. But thirty year-old Naatus speaks out in public and uses her real name and has even produced an article entitled ‘My Body was Not Mine,’ contributing to a broader pamphlet on women’s rights in minority groups in Finland.

– I wrote on it when I was asked. I thought the issue was important and I have nothing to be ashamed of, she told YLE Radio.

Naatus is a mother of one and is recently divorced from a Lutheran priest. She told YLE that almost as soon as she had her first child there began social pressure to have another one. Laestadians, according to Naatus, if a woman does not follow the accepted pattern of frequent pregnancies.

Naatus claims that Laestadians do use contraception, though its not really discussed.

– You can’t even speak of these things by their real names, she admits. Young Laestadians in Finland secretly use contraception. This is clear, says Naatus. The question about the right to  individually

However, if a particular couple are deemed not to have ‘enough’ children then this will raise concerns in the group’s discussion circles, and the firmness of their ‘faith’ may well be questioned. Some academic researchers have recently pointed out similar results.

Naatus believes that in twenty to thirty years Laestadian women will be get more into their own control of how many children they have. As a precedent she notes that in the 1960s it was ‘sinful’ for a Laestadian woman to perm her hair, but this is now acceptable. This is just one example for that the doctrines of Conservative Laestadians’ congragation are not unerring  nor immutable, as it is taught to be.

As more the younger generation knows about the history of the Laestadianism and about the human rights, as less they will adapt to the norms and commands given by the lay preachers in the future.

Author: R. K. , partly based on the Editor’s article in 65 Degrees North.

*       *       *

Read more:

Anonyymi: Mitä tapahtuu Iloisen talon kellareissa? Uutuuskirja ihmisoikeuskeskustelun sokeasta pisteestä.

Anu: Ajatuspolkuja ahdistetuille

Conservative Laestadians in Oulu

Ehkäisykysymys vanhoillislestadiolaisen herätysliikkeen opetuksessa 2000-luvulla.

Ex vl-isä: Paine suureen perheeseen on säälimätön. Kotimaa24 6.9.2011.

Johannes Ijäs: ”Naisen asema aikapommi vanhoillislestadiolaisuudessa”. Kotimaa24 30.9.2011.

Kapu: KION: Ehkäisykielto on ihmisoikeusloukkaus

Korpijaakko: SRK:n pöksylähetyskäsky

Laestadian Banning of Contraception Leads a Man to Plight

Mika Kuki: Aamuvieras: Lestadiolaiset vaikenevat ehkäisystä. Radio Mega 7.11.2011.

Laestadian Women Leads Charge Against ‘Big Family’ Pressure.  65 Degrees North 9.1.2012.

Lestadiolaiset pitävät Pohjois-Pohjanmaan väkiluvun kasvussa. MTV3 24.7.2002.

Rebekka Naatus: Minun ruumiini ei ole minun. YLE Oulu 14.11.2011.

Edward A. Suominen: Maternal Martyrdom. In: An Examination of the

SRK:n julkilausuma: ehkäisykiellon perustelu uskontunnustuksella (SRK 27.6.2009, Seppo Lohi)


1 kommentti

Kategoria(t): 2010-luku, avioliitto, äitiys, ban of birth control, bans, ehkäisykielto, erehtymättömyys, erottaminen yhteisöstä, forbidden things, hengellinen väkivalta, identity, in English, kiellot, lapset, lisääntyminen, naisen asema, normit, norms, painostaminen, pelko, pelot, perhe, suurperhe, vallankäyttö

One response to “Rebekka Naatus: Laestadian Women Resist Big Family Pressure and Criticize the Ban on Contraception

  1. Sharon

    Laestadian faith was most popular among poor people in Sweden and Finland, in the past when it was born, and also in the last century. Living in the country in hard circumstances there parents could not trust in that a newborn child would always survive to grow up. In that time lot of risks threated children’s life and there was not any medical help available. The child mortality rate was very high. It is understandable that families preferred to get more children as we today, to get even some of them to become adult. Children were considered as labour force and the parents elderly care as well.

    The ideal of big families stayed in the laestadian congregations and it even became a strict religious rule for the Conservative Laestadians in Finland and America – although the life of people and circumstances have considerably changed.

    Former Laestadian blogger Daisy has a smart metaphor in a story she published in her blog about the cemented, jammed traditions which have their origins in the demands of practice and circumstances in the past. The idea has emerged from the practical living in certain time and place. There we can see the strong power of habits and practices illustratively. At the beginning of the tradition, it was done for a good reason. There was an understandable purpose. However, over time it has lost its original meaning and it became just a meaningless, silly rule, without any reason. Thus, when it has come into being and applied by many generations, seen as a valid solution, it is a long and hard way to get stopped. It has has now became a ”holy spiritual doctrine” -that will be taught for the youth in the congregation forever!

    – Daisy’s story:

    ”There was a woman who always cut the ends off her baked potatoes before she baked them. Her daughter asked her why, and she said she did it because her mother had always done it that way. So she went back to her mom to ask her why she did it, and her mom said HER mom had always done it that way, cutting off the ends of the potatoes. When this lady asked her grandma why she did it, her grandma said because she baked them in a pan that was skinny, and they didn’t fit if she didn’t cut off the ends.

    So the tradition had a purpose in the beginning, and at the end, it was just done because it had been done that way for years.”


Täytä tietosi alle tai klikkaa kuvaketta kirjautuaksesi sisään:

Olet kommentoimassa -tilin nimissä. Log Out /  Muuta )


Olet kommentoimassa Twitter -tilin nimissä. Log Out /  Muuta )


Olet kommentoimassa Facebook -tilin nimissä. Log Out /  Muuta )

Muodostetaan yhteyttä palveluun %s